18 research outputs found

    Polynomial versus Exponential Growth in Repetition-Free Binary Words

    Get PDF
    It is known that the number of overlap-free binary words of length n grows polynomially, while the number of cubefree binary words grows exponentially. We show that the dividing line between polynomial and exponential growth is 7/3. More precisely, there are only polynomially many binary words of length n that avoid 7/3-powers, but there are exponentially many binary words of length n that avoid (7/3+)-powers. This answers an open question of Kobayashi from 1986.Comment: 12 page

    On a generalization of Abelian equivalence and complexity of infinite words

    Full text link
    In this paper we introduce and study a family of complexity functions of infinite words indexed by k \in \ints ^+ \cup {+\infty}. Let k \in \ints ^+ \cup {+\infty} and AA be a finite non-empty set. Two finite words uu and vv in AA^* are said to be kk-Abelian equivalent if for all xAx\in A^* of length less than or equal to k,k, the number of occurrences of xx in uu is equal to the number of occurrences of xx in v.v. This defines a family of equivalence relations k\thicksim_k on A,A^*, bridging the gap between the usual notion of Abelian equivalence (when k=1k=1) and equality (when k=+).k=+\infty). We show that the number of kk-Abelian equivalence classes of words of length nn grows polynomially, although the degree is exponential in k.k. Given an infinite word \omega \in A^\nats, we consider the associated complexity function \mathcal {P}^{(k)}_\omega :\nats \rightarrow \nats which counts the number of kk-Abelian equivalence classes of factors of ω\omega of length n.n. We show that the complexity function P(k)\mathcal {P}^{(k)} is intimately linked with periodicity. More precisely we define an auxiliary function q^k: \nats \rightarrow \nats and show that if Pω(k)(n)<qk(n)\mathcal {P}^{(k)}_{\omega}(n)<q^k(n) for some k \in \ints ^+ \cup {+\infty} and n0,n\geq 0, the ω\omega is ultimately periodic. Moreover if ω\omega is aperiodic, then Pω(k)(n)=qk(n)\mathcal {P}^{(k)}_{\omega}(n)=q^k(n) if and only if ω\omega is Sturmian. We also study kk-Abelian complexity in connection with repetitions in words. Using Szemer\'edi's theorem, we show that if ω\omega has bounded kk-Abelian complexity, then for every D\subset \nats with positive upper density and for every positive integer N,N, there exists a kk-Abelian NN power occurring in ω\omega at some position $j\in D.

    Fine and Wilf's theorem for k-abelian periods

    Get PDF
    Two words u and v are k-abelian equivalent if they contain the same number of occurrences of each factor of length at most k. This leads to a hierarchy of equivalence relations on words which lie properly in between the equality and abelian equality. The goal of this paper is to analyze Fine and Wilf&#39;s periodicity theorem with respect to these equivalence relations. Fine and Wilf&#39;s theorem tells exactly how long a word with two periods p and q can be without having the greatest common divisor of p and q as a period. Recently, the same question has been studied for abelian periods. In this paper we show that for k-abelian periods the situation is similar to the abelian case: In general, there is no bound for the lengths of such words, but the values of the parameters p, q and k for which the length is bounded can be characterized. In the latter case we provide nontrivial upper and lower bounds for the maximal lengths of such words. In some cases (e.g., for k = 2) we found the maximal length precisely.</p

    On a generalization of Abelian equivalence and complexity of infinite words

    Get PDF
    In this paper we introduce and study a family of complexity functions of infinite words indexed by k in Z^+ U {+infinity}. Let k in Z^+ U {+infinity} and A be a finite non-empty set. Two finite words u and v in A* are said to be k-Abelian equivalent if for all x in A* of length less than or equal to k, the number of occurrences of x in u is equal to the number of occurrences of x in v. This defines a family of equivalence relations sim_k on A*, bridging the gap between the usual notion of Abelian equivalence (when k = 1) and equality (when k = +infinity). We show that the number of k-Abelian equivalence classes of words of length n grows polynomially, although the degree is exponential in k. Given an infinite word omega in A^N, we consider the associated complexity function P^(k)_omega : N -&gt; N which counts the number of k-Abelian equivalence classes of factors of omega of length n. We show that the complexity function P_k is intimately linked with periodicity. More precisely we define an auxiliary function q^k : N -&gt; N and show that if P^(k)_omega(n) &lt; q^k(n) for some k in Z^+ U {+infinity} and n &gt;= 0, then omega is ultimately periodic. Moreover if omega is aperiodic, then P^(k)_omega(n) = q^k(n) if and only if omega is Sturmian. We also study k-Abelian complexity in connection with repetitions in words. Using Szemeredi's theorem, we show that if omega has bounded k-Abelian complexity, then for every D subset of N with positive upper density and for every positive integer N, there exists a k-Abelian N-power occurring in omega at some position j in D

    Matrix equations and Hilbert's tenth problem

    Get PDF
    We show a reduction of Hilbert's tenth problem to the solvability of the matrix equation Xi1 1 Xi2 2 Xik k = Z over non-commuting integral matrices, where Z is the zero matrix, thus proving that the solvability of the equation is undecidable. This is in contrast to the case whereby the matrix semigroup is commutative in which the solvability of the same equation was shown to be decidable in general. The restricted problem where k = 2 for commutative matrices is known as the \A-B-C Problem" and we show that this problem is decidable even for a pair of non-commutative matrices over an algebraic number field

    Noneffective Regularity of Equality Languages and Bounded Delay Morphisms

    No full text
    special issue dedicated to the second edition of the conference AutoMathA: from Mathematics to ApplicationsWe give an instance of a class of morphisms for which it is easy to prove that their equality set is regular, but its emptiness is still undecidable. The class is that of bounded delay 2 morphisms

    Preface

    No full text

    On k-abelian palindromes

    No full text
    International audienceA word is called a palindrome if it is equal to its reversal. In the paper we consider a k-abelian modification of this notion. Two words are called k-abelian equivalent if they contain the same number of occurrences of each factor of length at most k. We say that a word is a k-abelian palindrome if it is k-abelian equivalent to its reversal. A question we deal with is the following: how many distinct palindromes can a word contain? It is well known that a word of length n can contain at most n + 1 distinct palindromes as its factors; such words are called rich. On the other hand, there exist infinite words containing only finitely many distinct palindromes as their factors; such words are called poor. We show that in the k-abelian case there exist infinite words containing finitely many distinct k-abelian palindromic factors. For rich words we show that there exist finite words of length ncontaining Theta(n(2)) distinct k-abelian palindromes as their factors

    On growth and fluctuation of k-abelian complexity

    No full text
    International audienceAn extension of abelian complexity, so called k-abelian complexity, has been considered recently in a number of articles. This paper considers two particular aspects of this extension: First, how much the complexity can increase when moving from a level k to the next one. Second, how much the complexity of a given word can fluctuate. For both questions we give optimal solutions
    corecore